Sapphire Health Consulting Copyright Policy
1.0 Policy Statement
The Sapphire Health Consulting Copyright Policy establishes guidelines regarding the Fair Use of copyrighted material, use of multimedia and copyrighted works in the classroom, and information regarding the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
2.0 Overview & Purpose
Sapphire Health Consulting’s copyright policy is based upon United States Copyright Law, Title 17, U.S. Code, 1976. The copyright law of the United States governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. This guide has been prepared in an effort to help the Sapphire Health Consulting community better understand what is allowable by law, and why some services that are technically possible may nevertheless be restricted. Sapphire Health Consulting will always remain open to receiving any new information on our interpretation of copyright law.
3.0 Scope
This policy applies to all members of the Sapphire Health Consulting community, who has access to information technology resources at Sapphire Health Consulting.
4.0 Policy
4.1 Responsibilities
Compliance with the federal copyright law and with this policy is the responsibility of every member of the Sapphire Health Consulting community, including faculty, staff, and students. All members of the Sapphire Health Consulting community are expected to take a personal interest in becoming informed about how copyright law affects our work at Sapphire Health Consulting.
4.2 General Information About Copyright
Copyright grants to the author or originator the sole and exclusive privilege of creating multiple copies of literary or artistic productions and publishing and selling them. Copyright protection exists for original works fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including:
literary works;
musical works, including any accompanying words;
dramatic works, including any accompanying music;
pantomimes and choreographic work;
pictorial, graphic, and sculpture work;
motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
sound recordings.
4.3 Copyright Protections and Fair Use Principles
To help members of the Sapphire Health Consulting community understand and comply with copyright laws, this document summarizes basic principles of copyright law including the application of the fair use balancing test. The principle of Fair Use offers additional access privileges in educational settings.
Copyright law is inherently complex. Fair use of a copyrighted work depends upon a specific determination based upon the circumstances of the use. The principles below are intended to provide an initial context for complying with the law.
Principle 1: The copyright holder has important and exclusive rights. Copyright law protects original works such as writings, music, visual arts, and films by giving the copyright holder a set of exclusive rights in that work. These rights include the right to copy, distribute, adapt, perform, display, and create derivative or collected works. In general, any use of copyrighted materials requires permission from, and potentially payment of royalties to, the copyright holder unless the use falls within an exemption in the law, such as the fair use exemption.
Principle 2: Responsible decision-making means that Sapphire Health Consulting community members must make demonstrable good faith efforts to understand the fundamentals of copyright law and the reasonable application of fair use. When Sapphire Health Consulting community members plan to use a copyrighted work in their teaching or research, they must examine the specifics of their use within the context of the law in order to determine whether they should seek permission for the use or depend instead upon the fair use exemption.
Principle 3: An appropriate exercise of fair use depends on a case-by-case application and balancing of four factors as set forth in a statute enacted by Congress. A proper determination of fair use – in daily practice and in the courts – requires applying these four factors to the specific circumstances of the use. These factors must be evaluated to determine whether most of them weigh in favor of or against fair use. The four factors include:
1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether the copied material will be for nonprofit, educational, or commercial use. This factor at first seems reassuring; but unfortunately for educators, several courts have held that the absence of financial gain is insufficient for a finding of fair use.
2. The nature of the copyrighted work, with special consideration given to the distinction between creative work and informational work. For example, photocopies made of a newspaper or news magazine column are more likely to be considered fair use than copies made of a musical score or a short story. Duplication of material originally developed for classroom consumption is less likely to be fair use than is the duplication of materials prepared for public consumption. For example, a teacher who photocopies a workbook page or a textbook chapter is depriving the copyright owner of profits more directly than if copying one page from the daily paper.
3. The amount, substantiality, or portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole. This factor requires consideration of 1) the proportion of the larger work that is copied and used, and 2) the significance of the copied portion.
4. The effect of the use on the potential market of the copyrighted work. This factor is regarded as the most critical one in determining fair use, and it serves as the basic principle from which the other three factors are derived and to which they are related. If the reproduction of a copyrighted work reduces the potential market and sales and, therefore, the potential profits of the copyright owner, that use is unlikely to be found fair use.
Principle 4: Nonprofit educational purposes are generally favored in the application of the four factors of fair use, but an educational use does not by itself make the use a "fair use." One must always consider and weigh all four factors of fair use together. The educational purpose of Sapphire Health Consulting will usually weigh the first of the four factors, the purpose or character of the use, in favor of fair use. However, an educational use does not mean that the use is, by that factor alone, a fair use. All four factors must be weighed in making a decision.
4.4 Copying Materials for Instructional Use
Under certain conditions specified in copyright law, a photocopy or other reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use", that user may be liable for copyright infringement.
Primary and secondary school educators have, with publishers, developed guidelines that allow an instructor to distribute photocopied materials to students in a class, without the publisher's prior permission, upon compliance with these conditions:
The distribution of the same photocopied materials does not occur every semester.
Only one copy is distributed for each student, which must become the student's property.
The materials include a copyright notice on the first page of the portion of material photocopied.
The students have not assessed any fee beyond the actual cost of the photocopying.
The amount of material should be reasonable in relation to the total amount of material assigned for one term of a course.
The effect of copying the material should not be detrimental to the market for the work. In general, the library should own at least one copy of the work.
4.6 Using Multimedia Materials
The use of multimedia materials is governed by the Fair Use Guidelines cited above.
Existing Video Footage
The borrowed material may not constitute more than 3 minutes of the original work, nor may it comprise the majority of the finished product. The opening screen of the project and any accompanying print material must include a notice that certain materials have been used under the fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998 specifically addressed digital media, including DVDs, and introduced new restrictions on copying. Section 1201 of the DMCA prohibits the circumvention of encryption on all digital media. It is a violation of the DMCA, for example, to make a digital copy of an encrypted DVD, because doing so would require breaking the copy protection. In November 2006, several exemptions to the DMCA restrictions were approved. One of the new exemptions is for multimedia works included in the educational library of a college or university's film or media studies department when circumvention is accomplished for the purpose of making compilations of portions of those works for educational use in the classroom by media studies or film professors.
Guidelines for Using Multimedia Sources
Existing multimedia (music, lyrics, music videos, motion media, photographs, and illustrations) can be incorporated into a student or faculty multimedia project. The amount of the copyrighted work that a student may use in her/his educational multimedia project is restricted by specific portion limitations (see below). In particular, the portion limitations relate to the amount of copyrighted work that can reasonably be used in educational multimedia projects regardless of the original medium from which the copyrighted works are taken. Only two copies of the student educational multimedia project may be made, for reserve and preservation purposes.
Attribution and acknowledgment are required. Students must credit the sources of the copyrighted works, display copyright notice and ownership information, and include notice of use restrictions.
Copyrighted Music, Lyrics, and Music Videos: up to 10%, but in no event more than 30 seconds.
Motion Media Work: no more than 3 minutes.
Photographs and Illustrations: no more than 5 images by an artist or photographer. For photographs or illustrations from a published collective work, no more than 10% or 15 images, whichever is less.
4.7 Digital Millennium Copyright Act
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) provides an opportunity for internet service providers (ISP’s) to shield themselves from liability for the actions of their users that infringe on the copyrights of others.
5.0 Enforcement and Penalties for Infringement
Substantial penalties can be imposed for infringement of copyright. An injunction to stop the infringement is most likely to be the first action. Payment of actual damages for financial loss suffered by the copyright owner may be required. Statutory damages, for which no actual damages need to be proved, may be assessed. If the court determines there is any infringement, it may award damages between $750 and $30,000. If the court determines that the infringement was willful, the penalty may be as high as $150,000 per item. In addition, Sapphire Health Consulting reserves the right to enforce violations of this policy. Failure to comply may result in suspension or termination of network services, appropriate disciplinary action, termination in the case of employees, or expulsion in the case of students.